?issue=all&type=all&year-from=&year-to=
Publications by Oliver Stuenkel
All Issue Areas
Global Order
Humanitarian Action
Migration
M&E
Peace & Security
Rights & Democracy
Data & Tech Politics
Years
-
Article 30 Oct 2023
BRICS, Format der vielen Optionen
Die Erweiterung der Staatengruppe ist kein antiwestliches Schreckgespenst – sie ist ein Ausdruck dafür, wie Staaten ihre Interessen bestmöglich verfolgen.… -
Commentary 22 Aug 2023
Vereint gegen den Westen
Den Brics-Staaten steht auf ihrem Gipfel Streit ins Haus – ausgerechnet, weil neue Mitglieder in den Klub drängen. Der Westen sollte genau hinhören, was dort gesprochen wird, statt die Gruppe abzutun.… -
Commentary 27 Feb 2023
Lulas Brasilien: Der schwierige Partner
Die Chance auf einen Neustart mit Deutschland ist da, trotz geopolitischer Divergenzen. Nötig sind mehr Realismus und mehr echte Kooperation.… -
Commentary 28 Dec 2022
Lulas Amtsantritt: Brasilien ist wieder ein wichtiger Partner
Lulas ist zurück als Präsident Brasiliens. Der Besuch von Bundespräsident Steinmeier kann der Start einer vielfältigen Kooperation sein.… -
Podcast 27 May 2020
COVID-19 in Brazil: the End of the Road for Bolsonaro?
The Brazilian government under President Bolsonaro has botched its response to the coronavirus. Could this spell impeachment for the Brazilian leader?… -
Commentary 09 Nov 2017
Brazil’s Foreign Policy Isn’t Dead. It’s Just Hibernating.
-
Commentary 31 Jul 2017
China-India Border Dispute Shows Why the BRICS Grouping Matters More Than Ever
-
Podcast 05 Dec 2016
How Emerging Powers are Remaking Global Order – A Talk with Oliver Stuenkel
With emerging powers like China, India and Brazil playing a growing role in international affairs, the global balance of power is shifting. What does this mean for the future of the international order? Will China dominate the twenty-first century? Will the BRICS grouping prove to be a disruptive… -
Journal article 05 Nov 2015
“Responsibility While Protecting”: Reforming R2P Implementation
Introduction The intervention in Libya in 2011 was an early test for the coercive, non-consented operationalization of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), sparking a policy debate on how and under what circumstances protection should actually be conducted. This article analyses these debates on the… -
Journal article 05 Nov 2015
The Impact of the Libya Intervention Debates on Norms of Protection
Introduction Resolution 1973, which authorized military intervention in Libya, marked the first time that the United Nations Security Council explicitly mandated the use of force against a functioning state to prevent imminent atrocity crimes. The debate on the international community’s… -
Book review 26 Oct 2015
Book Review: Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect
-
Book review 13 Oct 2015
Book Review: International Orders in the Early Modern World
-
Book review 07 Oct 2015
Book Review: Is the American Century Over?
-
Book review 01 Oct 2015
Book Review: Russia’s Postcolonial Identity: A Subaltern Empire in a Eurocentric World
-
Commentary 21 Sep 2015
Missão impossível em Caracas?
-
Commentary 15 Sep 2015
The Refugee Crisis Presents a Chance for Emerging Countries Like Brazil to Be Players
-
Commentary 03 Sep 2015
The BRICS Bank Isn’t Challenging the System, Only Western Leadership of It
Less than a month after the signing ceremony of the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) in Beijing, another global financial institution was launched 1200 kilometers further south. Based in Shanghai, China’s financial hub, the New Development Bank’s creation marks an important step… -
Commentary 31 Jul 2015
Rumo à Instabilidade Global?
-
Working paper 06 May 2015
The G7 and the BRICS in the Post-Crimea World Order
-
Policy brief 07 Apr 2015
针对残暴犯罪 实施有效 负责任的保护: 走向全球行动
By Thorsten Benner, Philipp Rotmann, Erna Burai, C.S.R. Murthy, Christopher Daase, J. Madhan Mohan, Julian Junk, Xymena Kurowska, Liu Tiewa, Wolfgang Reinicke, Ricardo Soares de Oliveira, Matias Spektor, Oliver Stuenkel, Marcos Tourinho, Harry Verhoeven, Zhang Haibin概要 联合国修订保护的责任纲要已经十年,全球保护的责任的形势依旧严峻。有人认为:全球以“西方”干涉主义为一方,“非西方”主权捍卫者为另一方的争论,双方对核心问题认识的差异导致了在这个问题上乏善可陈。这些人忽视这场政治争论的实质;因此无法切实严肃面对针对暴行罪提供保护所必须面对的种种实际挑战。…